APPROACH TO THE ACUTELY ILL INFECTED FEBRILE PATIENT
The physician treating the acutely ill febrile patient must be able to recognize infections that require emergent attention. If such infections are not adequately evaluated and treated at initial presentation, the opportunity to alter an adverse outcome may be lost. In this chapter, the clinical presentations of and approach to patients with relatively common infectious disease emergencies are discussed. These infectious processes are discussed in detail in other chapters.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
APPEARANCE
A physician must have a consistent approach to acutely ill patients. Even before the history is elicited and a physical examination performed, an immediate assessment of the patient's general appearance yields valuable information. The perceptive physician's subjective sense that a patient is septic or toxic often proves accurate. Visible agitation or anxiety in a febrile patient can be a harbinger of critical illness.
HISTORY
Presenting symptoms are frequently nonspecific. In addition to a general description of symptoms, it is important to obtain a sense of disease progression. Detailed questions should be asked about the onset and duration of symptoms and about changes in severity or rate of progression over time. Host factors and comorbid conditions may enhance the risk of infection with certain organisms or of a more fulminant course than is usually seen. Lack of splenic function, alcoholism with significant liver disease, intravenous drug use, HIV infection, diabetes, malignancy, and chemotherapy all predispose to specific infections and frequently to increased severity. The patient should be questioned about factors that might help identify a nidus for invasive infection, such as recent upper respiratory tract infections, influenza, or varicella; prior trauma; disruption of cutaneous barriers due to lacerations, burns, surgery, or decubiti; and the presence of foreign bodies, such as nasal packing after rhinoplasty, barrier contraceptives, tampons, arteriovenous fistulas, or prosthetic joints. Travel, contact with pets or other animals, or activities that might result in tick exposure can lead to diagnoses that would not otherwise be considered. Recent dietary intake, medication use, social contact with ill individuals, vaccination history, and menstrual history may be relevant. A review of systems should focus on any neurologic signs or sensorium alterations, rashes or skin lesions, and focal pain or tenderness and should also include a general review of respiratory, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary symptoms. It is especially important to determine the duration and progression of these symptoms in order to gain an appreciation of the pace and urgency of the process.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
A complete physical examination should be performed, with special attention to some areas that are sometimes given short shrift in routine examinations. Assessment of the patient's general appearance and vital signs, skin and soft tissue examination, and the neurologic evaluation are of particular importance.
The patient may appear either anxious and agitated or lethargic and apathetic. Fever is usually present, although the elderly and compromised hosts, such as those who are uremic or cirrhotic and patients who are taking glucocorticoids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, may be afebrile despite serious underlying infection. Measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate helps determine the degree of hemodynamic and metabolic compromise. The patient's airway must be evaluated to rule out the risk of obstruction from an invasive oropharyngeal infection.
The etiologic diagnosis may become evident in the context of a thorough skin examination. Petechial rashes are typically seen with meningococcemia or Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF); erythroderma is usual with toxic shock syndrome (TSS) and drug fever. The soft tissue and muscle examination is critical. Areas of erythema or duskiness, edema, and tenderness may indicate underlying necrotizing fasciitis, myositis, or myonecrosis. The neurologic examination must include a careful assessment of mental status for signs of early encephalopathy. Evidence of nuchal rigidity or focal neurologic findings should be sought. Focal findings, depressed mental status, or papilledema should be evaluated by brain imaging prior to lumbar puncture, which, in this setting, could initiate herniation.
SPECIFIC PRESENTATIONS
For most infections, there is time for careful evaluation, diagnostic testing, and consultation with other physicians. However, the infections considered below according to common clinical presentation can have rapidly catastrophic outcomes, and their immediate recognition can be life-saving. Recommended therapeutic regimens are presented in.
SEPSIS WITHOUT AN OBVIOUS FOCUS OF PRIMARY INFECTION
These patients initially have a brief prodrome of nonspecific symptoms and signs that progresses quickly to hemodynamic instability with hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea, or respiratory distress. A patient may display altered mental status. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with clinical evidence of a hemorrhagic diathesis is a poor prognostic sign.
Septic Shock Patients with bacteremia leading to septic shock may have a primary site of infection (e.g., pneumonia, pyelonephritis, or cholangitis) that is not evident initially. Elderly patients with comorbid conditions, hosts compromised by malignancy and neutropenia, or patients who have recently undergone a surgical procedure or hospitalization are at increased risk for an adverse outcome. Gram-negative bacteremia with organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas hydrophila, or Escherichia coli and gram-positive infection with organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus or group A streptococci can present as intractable hypotension and multiorgan failure. Treatment can usually be initiated empirically on the basis of the presentation.
Overwhelming Infection in Asplenic Patients Patients without splenic function are at risk for overwhelming bacterial sepsis. Asplenic patients succumb to sepsis at 600 times the rate of the general population; 50 to 70% of cases occur within the first 2 years after splenectomy, with a mortality rate of up to 80%. However, in the asplenic individual, an increased risk of overwhelming sepsis continues throughout life. In asplenia, encapsulated bacteria cause the majority of infections, and adults are at lower risk than children because they are more likely to have antibody to these organisms. Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is most common, but the risk of infection with Haemophilus influenzae or Neisseria meningitidis is also high. Severe clinical manifestations of infections due to E. coli, S. aureus, group B streptococci, P. aeruginosa, Capnocytophaga, Babesia, and Plasmodium have been described.
Babesiosis A history of recent travel to endemic areas should raise the possibility of infection with Babesia. Between 1 and 4 weeks after a tick bite, the patient experiences chills, fatigue, anorexia, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, and headache; ecchymosis and/or petechiae are occasionally seen. The tick that most commonly transmits Babesia, Ixodes scapularis, also transmits Borrelia burgdorferi (the agent of Lyme disease) and Ehrlichia, and co-infection can occur, resulting in more severe disease. Infection with the European species Babesia divergens is more frequently fulminant than that due to the U.S. species B. microti, causing a febrile syndrome with hemolysis, jaundice, hemoglobinemia, and renal failure and a mortality rate of >50%. Severe babesiosis is especially common in asplenic hosts but does occur in hosts with normal splenic function.
Other Sepsis Syndromes Tularemia is seen throughout the
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment